SP
Nach SP
| SP | SP Name | Länge [km] | Zeit | Reihenfolge in SP | Diff. Führender (s/km) |
Schnitt | Reihenfolge nach SP | Gesamt | Diff. Führender | Zeitstrafen |
| 1 | SSS Zlín | 9.36 | 00:08:34.2 | 12. |
00:00:26.4 2.82 |
65.53 | 12. | 00:08:34.2 | 00:00:26.4 | |
| 2 | Slušovice 1 | 15.94 | 00:11:34.7 | 8. |
00:00:11.6 0.73 |
82.60 | 11. | 00:20:08.9 | 00:00:36.5 | |
| 3 | Pindula 1 | 18.43 | 00:11:13.8 | 3. |
00:00:09.4 0.51 |
98.47 | 6. | 00:31:22.7 | 00:00:33.4 | |
| 4 | Slušovice 2 | 15.94 | 00:12:06.8 | 5. |
00:00:20.7 1.30 |
78.95 | 6. | 00:43:29.5 | 00:00:50.4 | |
| 5 | Pindula 2 | 18.43 | 00:11:06.4 | 3. |
00:00:13.1 0.71 |
99.56 | 6. | 00:54:35.9 | 00:01:01.7 | |
| 6 | Lukov 1 | 11.38 | 00:10:35.9 | 12. |
00:03:07.5 16.48 |
64.43 | 9. | 01:05:11.8 | 00:04:09.2 | |
| 7 | Tesák 1 | 19.18 | 00:11:49.0 | 8. |
00:00:44.4 2.31 |
97.39 | 9. | 01:17:00.8 | 00:04:53.6 | |
| 8 | Lukov 2 | 11.38 | 00:07:44.0 | 6. |
00:00:30.2 2.65 |
88.29 | 9. | 01:24:44.8 | 00:05:23.8 | |
| 9 | Tesák 2 | 19.18 | 00:12:08.9 | 5. |
00:00:58.0 3.02 |
94.73 | 6. | 01:36:53.7 | 00:06:21.8 | |
| 10 | Halenkovice 1 | 21.4 | 00:13:34.7 | 6. |
00:00:40.5 1.89 |
94.56 | 6. | 01:50:28.4 | 00:07:02.3 | |
| 11 | Kudlovice 1 | 11.42 | 00:07:05.3 | 5. |
00:00:05.7 0.50 |
96.67 | 5. | 01:57:33.7 | 00:06:50.7 | |
| 12 | Maják 1 | 23.38 | 00:14:15.3 | 3. |
00:00:17.0 0.73 |
98.41 | 5. | 02:11:49.0 | 00:07:07.7 | |
| 13 | Halenkovice 2 | 21.4 | 00:12:21.7 | 6. |
00:00:00.0 0.00 |
103.87 | 5. | 02:24:10.7 | 00:07:07.7 | |
| 14 | Kudlovice 2 | 11.42 | 00:06:29.3 | 6. |
00:00:00.0 0.00 |
105.60 | 5. | 02:30:40.0 | 00:07:07.7 |
Information
| Datum und Zeit | SP | Information |
| 01.09.2012 15:09 | 6 | (50 - Kneifel Milan / Blažek Jaroslav): problems with electrics |